Group facilitation involves both the internal dimension of individuals and the external events to which they belong and which surround them. The theoretical concept of ‘Worldwork’ is based on the assumption that individual, dyadic and collective processes are interconnected and intertwined to the extent that the structures thereby manifest or repeat themselves on different levels. This idea becomes more understandable through the notion of an imaginary field. In this, individuals are connected to other individuals and groups, interact with each other, and are also moved and structured by them. The field „includes the subjective experience of the ‚habitat‘ and thus of all factors that condition behavior, thought, action, and feeling.“⁷ People are characterized by primary and secondary processes in their (experience of) life. According to Mindell, a primary process is the habitual identity and way of thinking. A secondary process is understood to be unconscious parts that ’send‘ signals and messages to the individual that often have little room to unfold in everyday routines or are sometimes perceived as conflicting and disruptive.⁸ These parts are processed in process work, that is, attempts are made to unfold, relate, and ultimately process the signals and information that originate and are perceived from interconnected channels. These processes at the individual level are shaped by so-called channels, which comprise our perceptual capacities. Through them, information is received and expressed: in addition to the basic channels of seeing (visual), hearing (auditory), feeling (proprioceptive), and moving (kinesthetic), these are the mixed channels of relationship (the encounter and reference to another person based on the basic channels) and world (reference to the social environment, events in the world, and others based on the basic channels and the relationship channel).⁹ The two channels of relationship and world are the connecting line of individual and society in the field, through which the mutual entanglements enter into our collective experiences. Similar to other concepts of conflict transformation, ‘Worldwork’ assumes that conflict as a natural interpersonal occurrence indicates a need for change in relationships and takes it as an opportunity and starting point for reshaping relationships, structures as well as frameworks of social reality. Thus, any behavior, different attitudes and structures can be seen as phenomena that arise through (inter-) action processes of (groups of) persons, but – and this is the crucial point also in the current crisis situation – can also be shaped together through appropriate processing and accompaniment.